Opinion: Bilt 2.0 is a Game (And That’s the Point)

If you’ve been watching the Bilt world closely, it finally feels like things have settled down. After a period of leaks, confusion, backlash, and constant clarifications, the full scope of Bilt 2.0 is now clear (hopefully). What we are looking at is not just a new rewards structure. It is a engagement system that plays out like a game. For anyone who valued transparency and predictability, this shift is frustrating. For users trying to maximize rewards, it can feel like a game that is rigged against them.

From Simplicity to a System of Engagement

Bilt 1.0 was revolutionary and simple. Paying rent earned points. The multipliers for dining and travel added extra value. Bilt’s only requirement was for the user to make five transactions a month to get the rent points.

But Bilt 2.0 changes the rules entirely. The new choose-your-own-adventure system is significantly more demanding. You must now decide on two distinct paths to earn points on most folks largest monthly expense:

• The Spend Tier Path: Your rent/mortgage-earning potential is now capped based on your non-rent/mortgage spending tiers. If you don’t hit specific spending targets on the card during the month, your ability to earn points on rent is either throttled or eliminated.
• The Bilt Cash Path: Alternatively, you can earn “Bilt Cash” on everyday purchases. You then redeem this cash to unlock rent/mortgage points at a rate of $30 Bilt Cash per 1,000 points (essentially trading $30 of cashback for ~1,000 travel points).

This system introduces additional opportunity cost into a category where it never existed before. You aren’t just paying rent anymore. You are managing what the right path is. And for the non-point maximizers, this is confusing, annoying, and frustrating. This is the definition of “friction” and a tax on your time and mental bandwidth.

Promotions like Rent Day bonuses act as Limited-Time Events in the Bilt game. They create urgency and force you back into the app/website to ensure you aren’t “falling behind” the value curve. This is gamification, but with real-world consequences. For those who are not willing to engage, you leave value on the table.

Complexity Feels Intentional

Bilt 2.0 is undeniably complex. Multiple cards, multiple currencies, thresholds, monthly caps, and conditional earning paths make the system difficult to optimize. This complexity feels intentional. It increases friction, encourages ongoing engagement, and makes it hard to fully extract value without careful attention.

Two renters with identical rent payments and similar spending habits can end up with drastically different outcomes. The message is clear here. Play the game. Actively tracks Bilt Cash thresholds, times purchases around Rent Day, and redeems strategically before caps reset to win. Fall behind and you lose.

That unpredictability is not accidental. It keeps users experimenting, engaged, and spending, often without realizing how much value they are leaving on the table. Amex and Chase also gamify rewards, but they do so on top of a predictable baseline. Bilt 2.0 makes engagement a prerequisite, if you want their cards to be competitive, not a bonus.

Why Bilt 1.0 Was Unsustainable

It is understandable why Bilt needed to change. Bilt 1.0 provided high-value rewards with no annual fee and automatic points on rent, a combination that was extremely generous by industry standards. According to reporting from WSJ, Wells Fargo has been losing an estimated $120 million per year on the Bilt Mastercard program, largely driven by those rewards and the lack of an annual fee.

From a business perspective, sustaining that model indefinitely was unrealistic. I understand something had to change.

The problem is not that Bilt evolved. The problem is how it evolved. Instead of simplifying the value proposition or introducing clearer trade-offs, Bilt 2.0 shifts the burden onto the user. Conditional rewards, opaque thresholds, and forced engagement replace simplicity with a structure that prioritizes attention capture over effortless value.

Bilt 2.0 is Not Worth It

For most users, Bilt 2.0 is simply not worth it. The system requires constant attention, careful tracking, and strategic spending. Every purchase, every redemption, and every timing decision carries weight. Small mistakes or oversights can meaningfully reduce the rewards you earn.

There are cases where Bilt 2.0 can still make sense. In a deeper analysis, I outlined how I would personally use the new cards. Even then, the value only materializes if you are willing to actively manage thresholds, timing, and redemptions.

That is the key distinction. Bilt 2.0 is no longer a passive rewards card. It is a system that rewards effort and punishes inattention. For users who enjoy optimization and treat points as a hobby, it can still be made to work. For everyone else, the effort required often outweighs the return. We already live in a world where our attention is constantly being demanded and having another system demand it is not the way.

A Call for a Better System

I get it. Bilt 1.0 was generous but unsustainable, and Wells Fargo faced real losses keeping it alive. That does not justify a system that relies heavily on breakage (profiting when users forget to use services or products they paid for) rather than genuine loyalty. There has to be a better way to build a financially sustainable rewards program without relying on opacity, pressure, or behavioral manipulation.

Bilt 2.0 may succeed at capturing engagement, but it does so at the expense of trust. A model that is transparent, fair, and profitable for both sides is possible. Until that happens, Bilt 2.0 feels less like a rewards program and more like a test of how much effort a user is willing to tolerate.

So what about you? Are you willing to play the game?

Comment below or Follow me on Threads, Bluesky, or X for more thoughts and daily updates.